2025/07/02 Successful Stories

Clean Pad Implementation Results – Extended Test Lifetime & Improved First Yield

Why Use Clean Pad?

During long-term testing, pin tips are prone to contamination such as tin adhesion or carbon buildup, which may trigger eutectic reactions and result in a decline in first yield.

In this case, a CST socket was selected as the Clean Pad implementation target. Through continuous testing, we compared first yield and the effect of Touchdown count on pin performance before and after Clean Pad adoption.

Before Using Clean Pad:

  • After approximately 64K touchdowns, offline cleaning was required every 15K–30K touchdowns.
  • After exceeding 200K touchdowns, test performance significantly degraded, and pins could no longer be used—complete pin replacement was required.
  • Before reaching 230K touchdowns, offline pin cleaning was conducted seven times due to low yield.
  • Pin tips were visibly worn and dulled.
Clean Time
Touch Down
Test Stage
Remark
1st Pin Cleaning
64.5K
After FT3
Low Yield (79.54%,55.3%) due to RT
2nd Pin Cleaning
86.5K
After FT3
Low Yield (….) due to RT
3rd Pin Cleaning
95.5K
FT1
Low Yield due to contact issue
4th Pin Cleaning
104.2K
FT1
Low Yield due to contact issue
5th Pin Cleaning
132.5K
FT1
Low Yield due to contact issue
6th Pin Cleaning
162.5K
After FT2
Self-initiated pin cleaning
7th Pin Cleaning
189.5K
After FT3
Self-initiated pin cleaning
8th Pin Cleaning
201.1K
FT1
Low Yield due to contact issue
9th Pin Cleaning
230K
FT1
Low Yield (….) due to RT

After Implementing Clean Pad:

  • Prior to 230K touchdowns, all cleanings were performed automatically after high-temperature testing, with no offline cleaning required due to low yield.
  • Offline cleaning only began after 235K touchdowns, triggered by elevated Ron resistance.
  • Before reaching 300K touchdowns, cleaning due to low yield occurred only three times
  • At 297K touchdowns, the pins remained in good condition, with no noticeable blunting observed.
Clean Time
Touch Down
Test Stage
Remark
1st Pin Cleaning
49.7K
After FT2
Self-initiated pin cleaning
2nd Pin Cleaning
133.7K
After FT2
After self-initiated pin cleaning, a Clean Pad experiment was conducted at 9.8K touchdowns.
3rd Pin Cleaning
159.4K
After FT3
Automatic pin cleaning performed after high-temperature testing.
4th Pin Cleaning
222.6K
After FT3
Automatic pin cleaning performed after high-temperature testing.
5th Pin Cleaning
236.2K
After FT1
FT2 low yield (impedance too high)
6th Pin Cleaning
267K
After FT3
Automatic pin cleaning performed after high-temperature testing.
7th Pin Cleaning
278.3K
FT2
FT2 low yield (impedance too high)
8th Pin Cleaning
293K
FT2
FT2 low yield (impedance too high)

Conclusion:

The implementation of Clean Pad has been highly recognized by the customer. Based on actual test data, the current pin lifespan has increased by over 70K touchdowns and continues to improve. Yield retention remains stable, indicating a significant extension in pin testing life and a noticeable reduction in contact failures.

Additionally, the number of offline cleaning sessions has been greatly reduced.
For customers focusing on automated testing, mass production, and enhanced test efficiency, Clean Pad proves to be a reliable and valuable auxiliary solution.

Related News

Contact Us Now

Complete online forms and Pin-Jet will have representatives to help you with professional services